RSS
As some states move to strip public employees of the right to negotiate contracts, the city of Los Angeles is reaching deals with its own unions to curb the impact of the budget crisis.
Labor leaders representing thousands of municipal workers agreed to increase contributions to retirement, saving the city $400 million and 600 jobs.
The deal, which union leaders finalized Thursday, reinforces the importance of unionism, said David Lewin, a professor at the UCLA Anderson School of Management.
Legislators have put unions at fault for spiraling costs in public retirement funds. Lewin, however, said union negotiation lowers costs and effectively deals with fiscal adversity – especially when both sides seek to benefit.
Lewin released research on March 21 comparing pay and retirement benefits for public and private sector employees.
The paper responds to legislation to eliminate the ability for unions to bargain contracts in states such as Wisconsin, New Hampshire, Ohio and Florida.
Lewin said unionism has little to do with the growing costs of retirement plans around the country.
He instead pointed to the sharp stock market decline from the recession as the leading factor.
Public officials advocating the measures are themselves covered by lucrative retirement programs, Lewin said.
The paper also shows that public employees are paid much less on average than their private-sector counterparts. Private sector employees are also shown to have higher benefits, particularly in the health care area.
In an interview with University of California student newspapers in early March, UC President Mark Yudof addressed the multimillion dollar gap in the UC’s retirement system.
He said the UC would be prepared to restructure its retirement benefits system in exchange for state support, which was proposed in a report by the California Legislative Analyst’s Office.
UC employees currently receive different benefits than state employees and K-12 teachers. The office proposed that the UC’s benefits align more with those of other state workers in exchange for renewed state funding.
Join the discussion
You Should Know: Any comments posted on dailybruin.com may be printed in the Daily Bruin. the Daily Bruin reserves the right to remove any comment deemed racially derogatory, inflammatory, or spammatory. Repeat offenders may have their IP address banned from posting future comments. Please be nice.
If this is the first time you've commented, your comment won't appear until you've verified your email address.
1 comment
Some University of California chancellors and their “gang” of vice chancellors can’t shoot straight: and that’s a problems for unions. UC Berkeley—one of the top universities in the nation, home to some of the finest professors, graduating some of the brightest students—can’t figure out how to save money. No joke. UC Berkeley spent $3 million plus expenses to hire an out-of-state auditing firm to help them find ways to reduce spending.
According to the Contra Costa Times, October 10, 2009, “When UC Berkeley Chancellor Robert Birgeneau ($500,000 salary) was confronted with the $150 million challenge, he gave the matter deep thought, turned his focus eastward to the Boston-based consulting firm Bain & Co. and agreed to pay a $3 million budget (actual cost $7.2 million and growing) over the next two years for someone else to solve the problem.
“We [the Times] never attended business school, but we’re pretty sure that one of the definitions of financial crisis is spending $3 million on consultants to tell you how to get by with $150 million less than you thought you had.”
The rationale for hiring the consulting firm given by Vice Chancellor Frank Yeary: “I understand at one level, … if you don’t have enough money, why are you spending money on external consultants? Most people who are closer to it say it’s more sophisticated than that.
“If we spend $1.5 million this year and $1.5 million out of savings next year and we’re successful in delivering tens of millions of dollars in savings every year, I think that’s the goal against which we should be judged.”
Incredible! Millions of dollars could have been saved just by using the expertise on UC campuses. The system has, for example, multiple senior administrators with Ph.D.s who are getting nice paychecks for their expertise, the Budget Office staff gets paid to solve budget problems, and the renowned Haas School of Business has a world class lineup of business experts and graduate programs in financial engineering, global management, accounting, financing, and operations management.
Moreover, the funds used to pay the high cost of hiring outside consultants could have been used to make up for state budget cuts, student fee increases, furloughs and layoffs.
But, according to Vice Chancellor Frank Yeary, “The reason for not relying on internal experts is that self-diagnosis is not always impartial.”
If this is the reasoning by UC Berkeley decision makers, it is no wonder they are in a fiscal crisis. If the university system can’t trust its internal audits, maybe it is time for outside auditors to make all the university’s financial decisions. Those decisions might be based on more practical thinking than those made by the current university leadership.
UCBerkeleyNews