RSS
UCLA hired Jim L. Mora to be its next football coach, as announced by Athletic Director Dan Guerrero on Saturday.
Mora, 50, will be the 17th coach in program history, replacing Rick Neuheisel who was fired by Guerrero on Nov. 28. Mora brings 25 years of NFL coaching experience to the UCLA program. Most recently, he was the head coach of two NFL teams: the Atlanta Falcons from 2004 to 2006 and the Seattle Seahawks in 2009. The Seahawks fired him after the 2009 season.
Mora will be payed roughly $12 million in guaranteed salary while his contract contains several performance-based incentives and bonuses.
“I realize that an opportunity of this magnitude doesn’t present itself more than once in a coaching career,” said Mora, whose father Jim E. Mora served as a UCLA assistant coach in 1974. “When the job was offered, I jumped at the chance to be a Bruin.”
This will be Mora’s first college head coaching job. His last assistant coaching job at the collegiate level came when he was a graduate assistant at the University of Washington in 1984, where he played as a defensive back. Both Guerrero and Mora acknowledged the challenges that come with being a first-time college coach but maintained no obstacle is too large.
“Although he’s never coached a game in college, the bottom line is he’s a terrific football coach,” Guerrero said. “He will surround himself with a staff that will aid in the transition from pro football to college football.”
Recruiting to a university, something Mora has never done, is among those challenges. Mora said he will use the credibility he gained from his work in the NFL, where he compiled a 31-33 record.
“I’m not naive enough to think I could just walk in day one and be an expert recruiter,” Mora said. “But if I surround myself with the coaches that have done it and people that have an expertise in it and I inject my personality and my passion into the process … we can convince some darn good football players to come to UCLA and be great student athletes for our program.”
In the two seasons since he has been out of coaching, Mora has served as a television analyst with Fox and the NFL Network. He was interviewed for multiple NFL assistant coaching positions in his time away but said he was waiting for the right opportunity to get back into college football.
“This isn’t something that just cropped up,” Mora said. “This has been a goal of mind since I left the Seattle Seahwaks. I’ve had a passion and a real strong desire to get back into coaching football and coaching football at the collegiate level.”
Mora, who officially accepted the position Saturday morning, has not made any decisions regarding the status of the current coaching staff at UCLA. The Bruins are preparing to play in the Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl on Dec. 31 against the Fighting Illini and start bowl practices on Sunday under the direction of interim coach and former offesnive coordinator Mike Johnson.
Johnson served as the quarterbacks coach for the Falcons during Mora’s first two seasons in Atlanta but Mora fired Johnson in 2005, but Mora says both have matured since.
He did leave the possibility of keeping current coaches on staff open.
“I don’t believe you have to go into a place and blow out the current coaches,” Mora said. “I’ve never believed that’s neccesarily the way to do it but our objective is to provide our student athletes with the finest coaches.”
Mora will call an NFL game for Fox on Sunday in Charlotte, N.C. after which he will return briefly to his home in Seattle before holding an introductory press conference at UCLA sometime early next week.
Join the discussion
You Should Know: Any comments posted on dailybruin.com may be printed in the Daily Bruin. the Daily Bruin reserves the right to remove any comment deemed racially derogatory, inflammatory, or spammatory. Repeat offenders may have their IP address banned from posting future comments. Please be nice.
If this is the first time you've commented, your comment won't appear until you've verified your email address.
4 comments
A 31-33 N.F.L. record? This is what justifies Dan Guerrero calling Mora a “…terrific football coach,”.
Guerrero must resign immediately. How is it possible Guerrero was so unprepared in his search for a coach? Guerrero is largely responsible for U.C.L.A. steady decline in football over the past ten (10) years.
Another 4 years of absolute misery and embarrassment for U.C.L.A. football and its fans (an endangered species for sure). I hope Guerrero is gone by the time Mora is fired and it’s time to find another coach – 4 years from now.
Dan has pushed the UCLA program back 20 years…..he has single handedly widened the SC/UCLA gap exponentially. Poor hire….waited till all good coaches had either been hired or turned off by the prospects of Dan G….Rich Rod, Leach, Chip, Kiff dog will all continue to feast on Bruin for years to come. A note to UCLA doners…..“tear up your checks or specify that your donation go to any program other than the soon to be mediocrity coined “UCLA football”
On first read, I thought this article had to be a joke. “Although he’s never coached a game in college, the bottom line is he’s a terrific football coach” and “credibility he gained from [with] a 31-33 record”??? Then I quickly corrected myself. It’s our program that is the joke. Why? Because we have idiot for an athletic director. Who on earth would hire someone to coach a sports as complex as football when the job candidate has no experience as a college coach?! Who would pay that guy not one, not two, but $12 MILLION dollars? Since Guerrero was dumb enough to do this, and Block was dumb enough to approve it, both of them should be kicked out of their jobs before they can do any more damage to this campus. Surely we can find people with a modicum of intelligence to right the wayward athletic department and the clueless Chancellor’s Office.
Why would Athletic Director Dan Guerrero hire a guy like Mora who has a losing track record? Dan, have you no common sense whatsoever? This is exactly why we keep having one horrible year after the next at UCLA. Maybe the success or failures of our coaches should be tied to the athletic director’s, yes?