RSS
UCLA’s Hannah Carter Japanese Garden, tucked among the private castles of Bel Air, is serene.
The growing fight to save it from being sold this spring is anything but. This much was clear at an emotional community meeting in Bel Air Tuesday evening.
The Japanese garden sits on a steep slope half a mile north of campus.
Through the main entrance gate, a series of narrow stone paths wind their way past a koi pond, a small teahouse and a pump-operated waterfall. Every inch of the grounds is covered in lush greenery. Bright red and pink flowers are in full bloom even in the middle of winter.
It has been called one of the best examples of Japanese gardens in North America – a living museum designed by two of the most famous garden architects of the past century.
The university, though, declared in November its intention to auction off the garden and a neighboring mansion for an estimated $15 million. Proceeds will benefit a number of academic programs.
About 80 people packed into a school auditorium Tuesday evening to rally against the impending sale.
Among them were local residents, UCLA faculty, alumni and three children of the late Hannah Carter – who, with her husband, former UC Board of Regent member Edward Carter, donated money for UCLA to acquire the garden and mansion in 1965.
According to an agreement between the Carters and UCLA in 1999, UCLA could choose to sell the mansion and use the money to create a $500,000 fund to maintain the garden in perpetuity. Remaining money from the sale would help fund the university’s academic mission.
But $500,000 is not nearly enough to cover the $120,000 in annual upkeep costs for the garden, said Brad Erickson, executive director of UCLA’s campus service enterprises. Erickson attended the Tuesday meeting to explain the university’s position.
He said the garden is inaccessible to the public. It has close to no parking and draws only 2,000 visitors each year.
And despite its aesthetic beauty, the garden serves no academic purpose for the university, Erickson said.
For these reasons, UCLA decided to put the garden up for sale along with the mansion. In 2010, a superior court judge cleared the way for this to happen.
Erickson’s argument was poorly received by his audience.
Meeting-goers became increasingly agitated, interrupting Erickson several times and accusing the university of obsessing over profit.
The garden is a public treasure, they said, and a future buyer might close it, or – worse – demolish it.
By law, the university is required to sell property to the highest bidder in a sealed auction process. Erickson encouraged garden lovers to attempt to buy the land themselves.
Yet people questioned why UCLA would not add terms to the bidding process that required a future owner to keep the garden open to the public.
One person suggested the university should keep the garden and find a donor to create a fund for its maintenance.
Erickson was apologetic but held his ground.
“I understand your point,” he said, repeatedly. “We’ve made a different decision, and I hope people will understand the reasons we are doing this are not callous or insensitive.”
Before leaving, Erickson asked for a show of hands of everyone who was “fundamentally opposed to UCLA selling the garden.”
Eighty hands shot up. Erickson took a breath.
“Okay,” he said. “I hear you. I’ll pass on those concerns.”
He filed quickly out the back of the auditorium.
As the meeting drew to a close, those in attendance pledged to fight on. They said they would email the chancellor, contact the media and appeal to local city councilmember Paul Koretz, who has already opposed the garden’s sale.
“UCLA is speaking about this like it’s a done deal,” said Adrian Fine, advocacy director for the Los Angeles Conservancy, which helped organize the meeting. “Let’s get these letters out now.”
UCLA’s Academic Senate may weigh in on the issue in an advisory manner, said senate chair Andrew Leuchter. Representatives from the administration will meet with the senate’s Council on Planning and Budget Monday.
As it stands, the university intends to release a bid package in mid-February, said Steve Olsen, UCLA’s chief financial officer. Bidding will start in May.
Join the discussion
You Should Know: Any comments posted on dailybruin.com may be printed in the Daily Bruin. the Daily Bruin reserves the right to remove any comment deemed racially derogatory, inflammatory, or spammatory. Repeat offenders may have their IP address banned from posting future comments. Please be nice.
If this is the first time you've commented, your comment won't appear until you've verified your email address.
5 comments
Re: sale of Japanese garden:
What an obscene gesture from an institution that ostensibly represents an enlightened point of view!
You might as well surrender your claims to provide higher education. Your assessment of the value of the garden is simplistic and naive. The garden is an invaluable, irreplaceable spiritual resource, balm to the souls of some 2000 individuals per year, WHO IN TURN NOURISH THE SPIRIT OF COUNTLESS OTHER INDIVIDUALS whose lives they touch. For once, act intelligently: FIND MONEY SOMEWHERE ELSE.
visited ddsionst
Regarding the UCLA Hannah Carter Japanese Garden, as I understood if from Jim Caldwell, son of Hannah Carter, the initial trust provided $500,000 for the maintenance of the garden in perpetuity. In later years, Hannah Carter realized that the garden would require more money to sustain it, so a provision was added that: If necessary, the house could be sold and proceeds from the sale would establish an endowment to provide any additional funds necessary to maintain the garden for generations to come. According to Mr. Erickson, UCLA expects to realize $9 million from the sale of the house. Of that amount, $4 million would be plenty to set up an endowment to preserve the garden, with $5 million left over for the academic purposes called out in the trust. The article says that the sale of the house would only generate $500,000 to maintain the garden; this is inaccurate.
One only has to read the literature about the garden, and enjoy the artistic beauty, cultural history, and serenity while walking through the garden, to realize that it most certainly has an academic purpose. UCLA is privileged to have such a spectacular Japanese Garden just minutes from campus. The garden is a hidden treasure that is an open-air museum. It contains a stone carved in Japan 1000 years ago, showing the Buddha seated in 16 different positions of worship; 16 signifies immortality. UCLA should halt the sale of this garden to the highest bidder, where it is in danger of falling into the hands of a developer, or returning to private hands out of public access. UCLA should honor the wishes of Hannah Carter and preserve this cultural treasure for our community. Cities need cultural gems like this one. I can only imagine that had Hannah Carter known that her beloved garden would be sold to the highest bidder, she would have given it to another institution.
I was at UCLA for quite a few years and never even knew about the existence of this garden! Half a mile is certainly a distance that’s not unreasonable to walk for many members of the UCLA community who live near campus. Parking would not have been an issue in that case. IMO, UCLA did a disservice to both Hannah Carter’s legacy and its community in failing to inform the public of its existence. I’m also disturbed that it also seems UCLA has practically made up its mind to sell the garden without informing the public at large first before coming to that conclusion. I question whether they have fully explored other funding possibilities before coming to their decision, and hope the public can convince UCLA to seek another course of action.
loved the article!
I just looked up directions from UCLA’s campus to the Hannah Carter Japanese Garden and it only takes one 7 minute bus ride to get there. I’m appalled that the university is using the excuse of difficult parking and transportation as a part of their reasoning for sale. Ignorant and inexcusable.