• printer friendly
• mail this article
• iPod format
• digg

Photo

A U.S. Army honor guard carries the casket of Army Spc. Richard Allen Hardy from the Church of th

Photo

Marine Sgt. Dennis Untalasco stands on Bruin Walk, seeking potential student recruits. Of the mor

Some were a couple years older, some a year younger, but more than half of the American soldiers killed in Iraq were the same age as most students at UCLA.

Of the more than 2,000 Americans who have died in the war, at least 1,064 were between the ages of 18 and 24, according to a New York Times registry.

This poses a daunting challenge for military recruiters and marketing specialists aiming to enlist college-age students, which is a demographic that makes up a great portion of the armed forces’ rank and file.

Twenty-five-year-old Army Cadet Jason Hemke said he decided to enlist during his senior year of high school because college did not appeal to him at the time, and the military sparked his interest.

Like many enlistees, Hemke used his time in the military to figure out what he wanted to do with his future.

“I just really didn’t know what I wanted to do with the rest of my life,” Hemke said.

Today, Hemke, who served as a gunner in Iraq, is a second-year political science student at California State University, Northridge. He said he hopes to transfer to UCLA and eventually attend law school. The military often funds such graduate work for Reserve Officers Training Corps officer candidates.

“The notion of the military as preparation for life is a very powerful motivator,” said David Stewart, a professor of marketing at the USC Marshall School of Business.

But with the U.S. death toll rising in Iraq, some wonder how the military can battle already-slumping recruitment rates and continue to persuade the American youth to enlist.

The answer, according to some experts, is old-fashioned incentive-based persuasion, with a touch of new-age image makeover.

“You’ve got to make people think in terms of the benefits,” said Michael Kamins, also a professor of marketing at USC. “It makes sense to redirect your attention to the benefits the army can give you.”

In recent months, the Army – the branch of the armed services shouldering the most casualties in Iraq – has shied away from its “Army of One” marketing strategy. Instead, it has been catering to parents, with a stronger emphasis on the military’s potential to straighten up, educate, and employ college-age enlistees.

“They have so much money that they must be able to hire people who are good at marketing,” said UCLA political science Professor Thomas Schwartz. “They must have tested these pitches on small groups and found them effective.”

The ad campaign is not an empty promise – the military offers both pay and education incentives to college-age enlistees. Among these is the Montgomery GI Bill, which promises tuition aid upon completion of service.

Officer candidates, like those enlisted in the ROTC program on campus, can attain their college degrees while completing military training.

“The armed forces tend to be a very, very strict equal-opportunity employer. They actively recruit members of minority groups that might feel that, in other types of employment or certain schools, they are not welcome,” Schwartz said.

Hemke, like many others affiliated with the military, welcomes the choice to move away from the “Army of One” ad campaign.

“It’s supposed to be a team,” Hemke said. “That sent the wrong message.”

Many have also welcomed the new ad campaign because it caters to parents, who often pose a hurdle to their children making the potentially dangerous commitment to enlist.

“You’ve done well 18 years, and they’ve survived, and now they might possibly be facing a dangerous situation,” said Marines Capt. Arnie Carillo.

“It’s natural parental behavior.”